Teaching effectiveness of the trauma evaluation and management module for senior medical students.

BACKGROUND: The Trauma Evaluation and Management (TEAM) module was devised by the American College of Surgeons for teaching senior medical students trauma management principles. This article reports on the teaching effectiveness of this module. METHOD: Cognitive skills (by 20 item multiple-choice question examination on trauma topics) and clinical trauma management skills performance, using the Objective Structured Clinical Examination, were compared between two groups of 16 randomly selected final year medical students who had completed the standard curriculum including trauma topics. One group had the TEAM (TEAM group) and the other did not (no-TEAM group). Objective Structured Clinical Examination score (percentage), Priority score (range, 1-7), Organized Approach score (range, 1-5), and Global Pass status were assigned at each station. The students also completed a five-part questionnaire. RESULTS: Results of the questionnaire showed that on a scale of 1 to 5, with 5 being excellent, 96.8% assigned a score of 4 or greater, indicating the objectives were met, 83.8% that trauma knowledge was improved, 51.6% that clinical skills were improved, 90.3% that the module should be mandatory, and 83.9% overall satisfaction with the program. CONCLUSION: The TEAM module is very effective in teaching trauma management principles to senior medical students, by whom the program was very well received. Consideration should be given to adopting this program more widely in our medical undergraduate curriculum.

Comparison of performance of interns completing the old (1993) and new interactive (1997) Advanced Trauma Life Support courses

BACKGROUND: The 1997 edition of the Advanced Trauma Life Support (ATLS) course emphasized interactivity as its major change. The impact of this change is assessed in this study. METHODS: We compared two matched groups of 16 interns completing either the old (group I) or new (group II) ATLS course. Cognitive skills (40 standard ATLS questions plus 10 additional questions on airway and shock) and clinical trauma management skills (four trauma objective structured clinical examinations [OSCEs] on simulated trauma patients) were tested. OSCE station scores (standardized to a maximum of 20), priority scores (graded 1-7), organized approach global passing grades (graded 1-5), and initial assessment test station scores (graded 1-5) were compared. RESULTS: Using ATLS criteria, three interns failed in each group. Post-ATLS examination quesiton scores were similar (84.5 +/- 6.9 for group I, 85.9 +/- 7.1 for group II); scores for the airway and shock questions were higher but not different between the two groups. The four OSCE station mean scores varied between 13.9 +/- 2.0 and 15.4 +/- 2.1 for group I and were higher (P < 0.05) for group II (17.9 +/- 1.6 to 19.1 +/- 1.0). Priority scores were similar (group I, 6.3 +/- 1.1; group II, 6.4+/- 1.2), but approach scores (3.9 +/- 0.1 for group I and 4.9 +/- 0.8 for group II). There were 8 honors grades in group I and 40 (p < 0.05) in group II. Interactive teaching, adult education principles, opportunities for discussion, provision of feedback, and stimulation of self-learning were rated more highly in the new course. CONCLUSION: Using standard ATLS pass criteria, performance after the new and old ATLS courses was similar. Superior performances were measured using OSCE methodology for clinical trauma management skills after the new compared with the old ATLS course in this population of interns.(Au)

Effect of basic prehospital trauma life support program on cognitive and trauma management skills

We tested the effectiveness of a basic prehospital trauma life support (PHTLS) program by assessing cognitive performance and trauma management skills among prehospital trauma personnel. Fourteen subjects who completed a standard PHTLS course (group I) were compared to a matched group not completing a PHTLS program (group II). Cognitive performance was assessed on 50-item multiple choice examinations, and trauma skills management was assessed with four simulated trauma patients. Pre-PHTLS multiple choice questionnaire scores were similar (45 +/- 9.4 percent vs. 48.4 +/- 8.9 percent for groups I and II respectively), but the post-PHTLS scores were higher in group I (80.4 +/- 5.9 percent) than in group II (52.6 +/- 4.9 percent). Pre-PHTLS simulated trauma patient performance scores (standardized to a maximum total of 20 for each station) were similar at all four stations for both groups, ranging from 7.9 to 10.4. The post-PHTLS scores were statistically significantly higher at all four stations for group II (range 8.0 - 11.1). The overall mean pre-PHTLS score for all four stations was 8.3 +/- 2.1 for group I and 8.8 +/- 2.0 (NS) for group II; the group I post-PHTLS mean score for the four stations was 17.1 +/- 2.7 (p < 0.05) compared to 9.1 +/- 2.3 for group II. Pre-PHTLS Adherence to Priority scores on a scale of 1 to 7 were similar (1.1 +/- 0.9 for group I and 1.2 +/- 1.0 for group II). Post-PHTLS group I Priority scores increased to 5.9 +/- 1.1. Group II (1.1 +/- 1.0) did not improve their post-PHTLS scores. The pre-PHTLS Organized Approach scores in the simulated trauma patients on a scale of 1 to 5 were 2.1 +/- 1.0 for group I and 1.9 +/- 1.2 for group II (NS) compared to 4.2 +/- 0.9 (p < 0.05) in group I and 2.0 +/- 0.8 in group II after PHTLS. This study demonstrates improved cognitive and trauma management skills performance among prehospital paramedical personnel who complete the basic PHTLS program.(Au)

Open prostatectomy: a study on 132 cases done at two hospitals in Port of Spain

Clinical data on 132 patients who received open prostatectomy during a 9-year period at two institutions in Port-of-Spain, Trinidad, are presented. There were 104 patients from the Port-of-Spain General Hospital and 28 from a private institution. The overall mortality was 38 percent, wound infection contributing to death in most of these cases. The majority of complications which followed prostatectomy performed under the conditions which exist in these two institutions were infective in origin. These can be prevented by performing early prostatectomies when the need for catheterization arises. It is concluded from the results of this study that, despite the conditions which exist at the Port-of-Spain General Hospital, open prostatectomy in old men is a safe procedure. (AU)